JTDS VS MICROSOFT JDBC DRIVER

I have "lib" directory in the project and I have those jar files there. However it does not support datetime2 improved precision fully - it gets treated as datetime. The only thing worse than running into a deep-in-the-stack bug in a database driver is one that you can't correct, let alone debug properly. Still not totally happy with their direction on Java. Microsoft offers a full JDBC4. Powered by Confluence and Scroll Viewport. What are the differences between each driver?

Uploader:	Mura
Date Added:	12 June 2014
File Size:	53.34 Mb
Operating Systems:	Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads:	7471
Price:	Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

One relevant difference is, that the JDBC 4. Help us improve MSDN.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for JDBC Driver

Email Required, but never shown. The driver implements the JDBC 3.

This is really cool. The jTDS driver is a type 4 and in my experience has better performance. Thus, your application does not have to request the adaptive behavior explicitly to get the adaptive buffering behavior.

Microsoft has been open-sourcing a lot lately, but it seems to be mostly "peripheral" software SloopJon on Nov 18, This is really cool. Oh, this driver was really troublesome! I have been using the jTDS driver in a production environment without any issues for 5 years.

At google we generally force style guide compliance. Starting with microsof 1. You know what's worse?

By continuing to browse this site, you agree to this use. But I just cant stand the loving hype for MS here. In the Bitbucket Server home directorybitbucket. Those additional libraries are under the license included with the downloadable package.

Bitbucket Support

What a steaming pile, not to mlcrosoft having to navigate the labyrinth of the IBM download site to even find it in the first place. How to proceed In the Bitbucket Server home directorybitbucket. Microsoft seems to be open-sourcing a fair bit of stuff lately. Several support options are available. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. The only thing worse than running into a deep-in-the-stack bug in a database driver is one that you ve correct, let alone debug properly.

Thanks Lfsantos Program Manager. I don't fault them. However it does not support datetime2 improved precision fully - it gets treated as datetime.

Open Sourcing the Microsoft JDBC Driver and Maven Support | Hacker News

Doing good job there. At best there's very poor argument for security through obscurity or you're doing something silly like hiding server side features behind client side feature flags.

They gave out such horrible and dog slow drivers to their paying customers that people reverse engineered the protocol and wrote their own. Can any MSFTies here describe how this is tested?

Powered by Confluence and Scroll Viewport. Thursday, October 8, 7: This is important if you want to use Hibernate 4.

I know it's possible to not use mvn, just wondering what people did in cases like this where a possibly major component in the stack was unavailable.